We have never set in stone the process for becoming a new player and have just assumed that everyone who has joined after the start of the game is a player. I currently have a proposal in the works that allows any new players to officially join, but some of the new 'players' are offended that they are not included in my list and may vote it down.
What I'm asking ruling on is, after changing the player list in my discussion to include all players who have been here since the start of the game and have not since lapsed, whether any players who have joined since that start are temporarily not players until we have established some sort of method to induct them.
Already covered under a pending instruction as modified by subsequent judgment.
ctmf's recent judgments regarding who is a player are retroactive and illegal. Although we must all follow these rulings, no matter how wrong, I certainly won't blame those who ctmf has attempted to exclude when they continue participating.
> ctmf's recent judgments regarding who is a player are retroactive and illegal.
Nothing forbids retroactive judgments. Maybe you're misremembering 107, which applies only to rule-changes?
First they came for the Belgians, volkspider...
Was that your fault too?