SIDE OFFER: Making Aaron play differently

Approve
67% (8 votes)
Reject
33% (4 votes)
Total votes: 12
 

This offer is in response to ongoing objections to my intransigence from jay, ssg, and others. It is not a rule proposal.

The deal is as follows

-put a tiny gold star gif in front of my name, displayed on all posts. This gif is exclusive to me, and no other player will have a specially adorned name
-on the player list, put me in a special section at the very top called "players who were given a special gold star to shut up and play right"

In exchange for this deluxe treatment, I will:

-immediately abandon my sockpuppet Abron
-never engage in further sockpuppetry
-vote "yes" on every proposal until some form of majority rule is brought in or the next 5 proposals, whichever is greater
-stop doing anything that might be interpreted as "role playing"

This offer is withdrawn if not approved by a simple majority before 310 goes to vote.

#
 
 

This is assuming our master computer whiz host jay has the technology to make this feasible - but if he can set up this drupal, and if he can make Spinach dip like this, I figure he can do anything.

#
 
 

Once again I am being asked to throw Abron under a bus and once again I vote NO.

#
 
 

It isn't too late to change your mind, 1. I heartily endorse this proposal, and urge everyone to vote for my destruction. For the good of MeFiNo and the glory of Aaron I am gladly willing to fall on the grenade.

Please kill me. Please. Kill. Me.

#
 
 

I respect 1's opinion so much I'm going to vote No. This has no bearing on implementation if passed.

#
 
 

Hey, blink works.

I reject and denounce the poll's title: he was already playing right. But this too is playing right, and it seems to be what he wants, and most importantly it makes passing majority rules in 310 much more likely. So I reluctantly vote yes, and may God have mercy on Abron's soul.

#
 
 

Oooh, a deadlock. While there may be much hope for the outcome to be favourable, I also must consider proper implementation, and vote no.

#
 
 

3/3 now, it seems.

#
 
 

The idea of paying someone to be an upright player rubs me the wrong way, regardless of how trivial the payment is. I think encouraging this behavior ("hold the game hostage till you get your way") would be a really bad idea.

#
 
 

I personally believe I have been an upright player from day one, volkspider. It is a case of others wanting me to play in a very different way, and I am agreeable to modifying my play style in exchange for these meaningless baubles. What's to lose?

#
 
 

I personally believe I have been an upright player from day one

Sock puppets are frowned upon all over the internet. How can you believe that being a childish brat should entitle you to a bauble?

#
 
 

I prefer to think of myself as a master strategist, jeblis. It helps me sleep at night. Now vote yes for my gold star or I am going to hold my breath until my face turns blue.

#
 
 

I think encouraging this behavior ("hold the game hostage till you get your way") would be a really bad idea.

I'd much rather AAA hold the game hostage until he gets a gold star than hold the game hostage until the only rule change he will accept is proposed. Everyone is well aware that they can hold the game hostage if they desire (and a few seem to be doing so), so it seems a bit odd to claim that AAA is holding the game hostage when he is actually promising to not do so.

#
 
 

How can you believe that being a childish brat should entitle you to a bauble?

You know how parents stick a soother in their kids' mouth to get them to shut up? Think of the gold star as a soother.

#
 
 

I changed my vote to "yes" for a lot of complicated reasons that would break the character limit.

Jay, since you are follow my lead on this important issue I heartily encourage you to change your vote as well.

#
 
 

SubWolf is not yet a player, so at least for the moment his vote doesn't count. Apologies, SubWolf, such is the state that ctmf has placed you in.

I think that based on ctmf's most recent ruling, jay is obligated to ban the SubWolf account for voting in a poll.

#
 
 

Re-reading the judgment it would appear that it is now at jay's discretion, as a TOS violation, what to do about a non-player voting in a poll. How will you deal with this grave transgression, jay?

#
 
 

This is true. That vote doesn't count. SubWolf, you're banned. I'll explain it later.

#
 
 

I'm change my vote per 1's change of vote, having delegated my authority on this matter to someone paying attention.

SubWolf's ban can be immediately challenged when 310 is posted. Or sooner if ctmf feels forgiving and SubWolf gets an advocate.

#
 
 

Do we know for sure that Abron is Aaron's sockpuppet? Besides just his claim that is? I woudn't put it past him to use this ploy to kill off someone else's sockpuppet, or in other words to be playing a deeper and tricksier game than it appears.

I'll vote yes anyway because I don't care one way or the other about baubles.

#
 
 

I've always secretly hoped he's trying to prove his anti-point.

#
 
 

jay, do you mean something along the lines of "The people have spoken, and they want Abron to remain part of our community"? I guess that would be a win of sorts, too, but not the glorious radiant victory I truly crave.

#
 
 

I'll vote yes if you change s/play right/play differently/g

#
 
 

Until then, I abstain.

#
 
 

ctmf: done

#
 
 

I meant, I hoped the extra accounts here were to demonstrate that democracy can be manipulated, and to challenge the group to form a more resilient ruleset, not as an actual ploy to gain ground.

#
 
 

Shelleycat: given Abron's comment upthread, that would only be possible if there was another puppetmaster in collusion with my scheme.

#
 
 

For what it's worth I'm still not convinced that Aaron isn't every other player besides me.

#
 
 

Some day you'll be Aaron too.

#
 
 

For what it's worth I'm still not convinced that Aaron isn't every other player besides me.

Getting needlessly existentialist, hmm?

#
 
 

You realize he's only offering to get rid of one of his sockpuppets... What about AAA Aaron? Or whoever else he created?

#
 
 

I have only ever controlled one sockpuppet, AAA Abron B Abronson. Although there is no way for me to definitively prove that to you, please note that part of my pledge here is that "I will never engage in further sockpuppetry". I understand that to mean I won't create sockpuppets, I won't log in as a sockpuppet. Not ever ever no way. Do you really think I'd put my precious gold star at risk like that?

#
 
 

And also realize, backseatpilot, that if you take me at my word that means that there are MORE THAN ONE evil puppetmasters currently active in this game. I'm actually the least evil of this reprehensible bunch, as I am up front about it and, inshallah, soon to be the ONLY player who has made a firm and enforceable commitment to not do that bad evil thing.

#
 
 

a firm and somewhat, but not really practically enforceable commitment

#
 
 

Huh? If I don't meet my side of the bargain, I would assume my precious shining star of gold would be yanked.

#
 
 

But catching you, assuming you did not go out of your way to be obvious and that Jay abides by his site policy of keeping secrets, would be unlikely.

#
 
 

Perhaps we can get a judge to rule that I get a virtual ankle bracelet, and ongoing IP monitoring by our vigilant host? I would happily consent to such a scheme if it would put you more at ease.

#
 
 

Nah, I'm good with the honor system for now.

#
 
 

Shelleycat: given Abron's comment upthread, that would only be possible if there was another puppetmaster in collusion with my scheme.

Good point. I'm almost disappointed. But not quite :-P

I did assume from the start that there were several people with sockpuppets. Possibly I'm being a chump by not joining in.

#
 
 

So if I misbehave, can I hold everyone ransom until there is a giant penis next to Aaron's name?

#
 
 

Why not, there's already one behind it. [ah-cha-cha-chaaaaa]

#
 
 

Oh, shoot, I forgot that I was supposed to wait until this was settled. Well, it looks to me like this is settled. Aaron gets his star and has to vote yes for some sort of majority rules for five turns.

#
 
 

(Final vote was 7-3 with four abstentions. That's a clear pass. Also AAA Aaron A Aaronson gets a ban.)

#
 
 

correction: it was 7-2. Forgot SubWolf voted. Overwhelming support.

#
 
 

Yes, but not a majority. Aaron made it clear everyone needed to vote before 310 was posted, else a simple 2-to-1 vote would have sufficed. The legal list of voters contained "14 players total, 8 players needed for a majority vote." This poll failed to receive a positive vote from a majority of players.

#
 
 

Well, he said clearly "It is not a rule proposal," so there's no reason to think that the remaining votes aren't legitimate abstentions. (There's no mandatory voting on side polls.) We can only invoke the judgment of the wise AAA to see whether the overwhelming support of those who chose to vote is sufficient for his purposes.

#
 
 

Allahu Akbar, this poll was closed Thursday, May 15 2008 at 10:23 PM local time, with a majority vote of current players (8 total) in favour:
1, AAA, ctmf, gerryblog, jay, mosessis, Shelleycat, and ssg.

I await jay's implementation of his side of the bargain, and will immediately act on my four commitments. I hope you will pick a really pretty one for me sir. I am so excited, I just can't wait!

It is sad to see Abron go, and I am sure we will all miss him, but we all need to make the occasional sacrifice for the greater glory of myself personally.

As a side note to jeblis: sorry, friend, that this hasn't gone as you wished. You may certainly try to have a penis logo placed by my name, but based on your most recent performance I think you lack the diplomatic skills necessary to bring it off. I recommend warmth and carrots, sir, and wish you the best of luck in your future endeavors.

#
 
 

I hope that AAA's star has a sweet gradient for maximum shininess!

#
 
 

So if I misbehave, can I hold everyone ransom until there is a giant penis next to Aaron's name?

I thought, why not stars that look like a penis?

This shows up only in the blue theme. I'll need further bribes to implement it in the Foliage.

#
 
 

Player list updated as well.

#
 
 

You are a man of your word, jay, and you have my respect and admiration for that.

#
 
 

Ha. I love how ugly and, well, ugly that image is.

#
 
 

Ha. I love how ugly and, well, ugly that image is.

That's all I was waiting for. It's a more modest little star now, though the penistar one is still on the player list.

#
 
 

Well if it helps any the yellow one doesn't look that great on this computer either. But less obviously so. Heh.

#