Is AAA Abron B Abronson a player?

 

I think ctmf made it quite clear in his previous judgment that he is, ssg. From what I understand, Abron is that Meatbomb asshole ovedr at MeFi - or at least that's what the profiles here and over there indicate.

#
 
 

I'm sure you'll agree, AAA, that we should await the judgement of the esteemed judge ctmf and then follow his judgement blindly.

#
 
 

AAA: From what I understand, Abron is that Meatbomb asshole ovedr at MeFi

Actually, Abron's profile says his/her MeFi username is "smells like Meatbomb," which, as far as I can tell, isn't a real MeFi username.

#
 
 

Most definitely, ssg. If there's one thing that I am sure we all agree on, it's that the word of the judge must always be followed, regardless of our own (finite and fallible) interpretations of the rules.

#
 
 

I don't agree with that. Judges cannot break the rules. (Not that ctmf has.)

#
 
 

Actually, Abron's profile says his/her MeFi username is "smells like Meatbomb," which, as far as I can tell, isn't a real MeFi username.

I think the glue fumes are overpowering you, friend volkspider. From my sober perspective, Abron's profile says "Meatbomb", plain and simple. Man, I wish I was Meatbomb, he's so cool. I am certain that he's going to win this game.

#
 
 

So they are, so they are. I guess it's a good thing judges aren't bound by their own previous rulings.

#
 
 

This is our 8th official judgment invocation thread since the 308 vote, not counting the recognized invocations introduced in-thread.

Only at Metafilter.

#
 
 

I think it's a truism that anyone who's playing is a player. And AAA^2 is playing his ass off.

#
 
 

This is covered by a previous judgment this turn (ctmf v. sockpuppets, docket number 309-2). Appeals will only be entertained if someone can show a rule that is being broken, or that it meets the criteria of Rule 212 (players disagree, affects completion of the turn). Note that case 309-1 is still pending, which may also cover this request.

Alternately, decision 309-2 may be overruled by the players in accordance with the Rules.

Bottom line: this is not a new judgment, but application of a previous one. By judgment 309-2 ABA is a player.

#
 
 

Discussion: I don't want to unilaterally get into defining sockpuppets, methods of determining if one is a sockpuppet, qualifications for joining the game, etc. in a judgment. It's too complicated, and should be done IAW established democratic procedure. That may not be practical until the unanimity requirement is lifted, which I advocate anyway.

#
 
 

Besides, who would want to deny Meatbomb the chance to play MeFiNo? I hear he's a pretty solid hombre.

#
 
 

ctmf, this was a really bad decision.

#