Hey Jay,
Can we update the status on the main page to state that:
1) notJim has declared his turn over
2) if all invocations of judgment are cleared the next turn starts (1's turn)
List of open invocations:
3) xorry is the current judge for this turn
4) if anyone disagrees with the legality any of the above, please invoke a judgement
?
Also tracking Invoactions/judgements is going to be a problem, Can we put them somewhere special?
This seems to be what most people thought the rules imply.
In this way the action of 1 posting a proposal, coupled with clearing invocations would put us at turn 2.
Or if the invocations (new are old are not withdrawn), xorry could rule on them.
Mostly done. It gets cut off on the main page, but clicking Current State of the Game on the navigation bar goes to the whole thing (as does more... on the main page).
Feel free to edit as required - I made it as a helpful summary for everyone to use.
Nitpick - notJim may have declared his turn over, but that has no real effect. 1 can't go until there's a resolution on the Rule 105 question, either by official judgement, or by withdrawing the judgement, or by the remaining players voting (making the question moot for now).
Ok well then I guess we're waiting for xorry's action as judge.
Since there are no time frames, I just trying to figure out whose actions trigger the next process.
If no one objects to xorry as judge. He could solve a lot of interpretation questions for us.