Consent to move on to 313 following judgement invocations

I consent
100% (11 votes)
I do not consent
0% (0 votes)
Total votes: 11
 

I don't actually think this is needed, but it's an easy enough step.

#
 
 

When Judgment has been invoked, the next player may not begin his or her turn without the consent of a majority of the other players.

It doesn't say, "the next player may not go if someone objects". That would be an implicit consent model, with explicit objection.

I think the rule as written, given that we aren't sitting around a table so we can see nods, means explicit consent is needed.

I see it as another measure to prevent a couple players in cahoots from pushing illegal activities through before they get caught.

#
 
 

I'd be for a rule change that made it possible to go forward without explicit consent after a certain period, say a day, with no objections. If there is an objection, then I think we should make consent to move on explicit. However, as long as the rule stands as written, we have to follow it.

#
 
 

Ditto.

#
 
 

That was quick and painless. mosessis, you can put 313 to vote whenever you are ready (though I think we are still having some useful discussions in the 313 thread).

#