- 320 passed.
- Judgment invoked: Is flatluigi a player? ctmf ruled he is for the next 48 hours.
- We're waiting on flatluigi and 321.
- Discuss 322.
Current State
SearchRecent Proposals, Voting & Judgments
User loginActive forum topicsNavigationRecent comments
Who's online
There are currently 1 user and 0 guests online.
Online users
Who's new
|
In any case, someone needs to make a proposal to codify when turns start and end soon.
I agree with that.
So ruled. Abstaining players do not count against the total, so the proposal passed, 6 of 9.
PROPOSAL TEXT:
321/322. Currency
Points are fully transferable. Any player may transfer any number of points to any other player at any time by posting a notice to that effect in the Point Transfer Forum established for this purpose, provided said point transfer would not put the receiving player within eleven or fewer points from the victory condition. Transfers may be conditional upon the completion of specified act(s) by the receiving party; in case of conflict, the question will be decided by the player who has most recently concluded their turn who is not a party to the transfer.
The total number of points required to win the game will be raised to 300.
All active players will immediately receive a one-time award of 100 points.
This proposal takes precedence over all mutable rules.
bsp, good points both.
"the question will be decided by the player who has most recently concluded their turn who is not a party to the transfer." This *is* the current judge, unless they're a party to the transaction.
This is easy:
312. ...An abstaining player will be considered a non-player for the purpose of calculating whether a rule change or judicial override passes.
ctmf?
Also, this rule's point limit in its current form will be superseded by rule 208, since it is lower ordinally.
And... you should reword the last part of the rule to make it very clear that this point infusion is a one-off deal that occurs only immediately following the passage of the proposal.
Why not have the judge decide on the legality of a point transfer? Unless he/she is the one receiving points, that is.
I've always been in favor of new judges ascending when the next proposal is posted for vote, to cut down on opportunities for self-judging.
The rules also say nothing about using two colors, but we hold certain truths to be self evident.
The rules don't mention beginning, either. They say: "the player preceding the one moving is to be the Judge." AAA is therefore correct: because ctmf has finished his turn, he is no longer "the one moving." This must be either me or flatluigi.
Or the other alternative, which is that neither of your turns has begun yet, gerryblog.
We again see that "finishing your turn" is what makes you judge
Except that the rules are about the next turn beginning and don't mention "finishing" a turn at all.
We can't just go around claiming that a turn has begun if the player whose turn it is isn't playing. The definition of a turn is pretty clear that action is involved.
Of course, if the player whose turn it is isn't playing, then it can't that player's turn. That's the crux of the issue precisely: is it flatluigi's turn (not begun) or my turn (begun)?
Bravo, ctmf. We again see that "finishing your turn" is what makes you judge, despite the "next guy hasn't started" camp's spurious and illogical arguments.
And, furthermore: ctmf used two colours, how could he not be the judge?
I am Judge. My turn is over, therefore I am now the previous player, without regard to exactly who the current player is. It suffices to stipulate that there exists some player who is the current player, and that that player's turn has begun.
We can't just go around claiming that a turn has begun if the player whose turn it is isn't playing. The definition of a turn is pretty clear that action is involved. In any case, someone needs to make a proposal to codify when turns start and end soon.
Ctmf, I appreciate your bold leadership and use of two colors. You are totally the Barack Obama of MeFiNo.
ctmf, you are wise. Some very fair rulings and good precedents being set.
Wow! I'm on the love train.
♫ People all over the world, join hands...♫
Mm. You're right, shelleycat. He voted in 319, which was posted on 6/27. It's been less than a week.
I stand by my judgement, but suspend it for 48 hours, the commonly accepted waiting period. If flatluigi shows up, it's his turn, otherwise gerryblog's turn begins.
[my previous comment, that is]
[previous comment edited for clarity]
Did anyone try emaiing him to see what's up (I can't, I'm still at work)? He hasn't commented in over a month but was he voting in the meantime? Losing your turn is a bigger deal than just being removed from voting so there should be at lest some effort put into making sure it's the right call.
*Judgement suspended for 48 hours*
Wheras the rules now regulate joining the game, and provide for resigning from the game, I find that player status is regulated. Rule 116 therefore does not permit any other methods of adding or removing players from the game.
I also find, however, that the rules are unclear or silent as to what should be done when the player whose turn arrives shows no sign of particiaption. After considering game-custom and the spirit of the game, I judge that flatluigi has voluntarily forfeited the game per Rule 113. flatluigi may rejoin at a later time without penalty per Rule 314.
This decision was simplified by the length of time since flatluigi has participated in the game. Had it been only a day or two, it would have been a much more difficult question to judge.
The current player is gerryblog.
I am Judge. My turn is over, therefore I am now the previous player, without regard to exactly who the current player is. It suffices to stipulate that there exists some player who is the current player, and that that player's turn has begun.
Ruling on flatluigi's status to follow.
PROPOSAL TEXT:
321/322. Currency
Points are fully transferable. Any player may transfer any number of points to any other player at any time by posting a notice to that effect in the Point Transfer Forum established for this purpose, provided said point transfer would not put the receiving player within eleven or fewer points from the victory condition. Transfers may be conditional upon the completion of specified act(s) by the receiving party; in case of conflict, the question will be decided by the player who has most recently concluded their turn who is not a party to the transfer.
The total number of points required to win the game will be raised to 300.
All active players will immediately receive 100 points.
The definition of a player is "one free-willed human Metafilter member voluntarily playing the game of MeFiNo Nomic." It's my contention that flatluigi currently fails this test. If that's true, that makes me the moving player and ctmf the judge.
Are you trying to derail the game?
No. Are you?
gerryblog, you can't begin your turn until flatluigi is declared a non-player by the judge. The game just won't work if everyone goes around declaring this and that. You'll also note that playerhood is regulated by the rules, so you can't just remove people under 116.
In any case, since flatluigi has not yet begun his turn (and he is the next player until he is officially removed from the list), the judge here is backseatpilot. Your comment shows why claiming ctmf is the judge makes no sense, yet you still insist on doing so. Are you trying to derail the game?
Side argument regarding the inevitable argument over who is judge. As I have proven beyond all reasonable doubt that flatluigi is no longer a player (see above), it is clear that my turn has already begun, as the discussion of 322 is already in process and I'm simply waiting for the all-clear to post the voting thread. This surely makes ctmf the judge.
If ctmf rules against me, this means flatluigi is a player, which means he has not yet begun his turn, which (per the game custom established over my objections during the shelleycat/ssg debacle) means ctmf is not yet the judge and therefore has no authority to rule in the first place.
So:
* Logically the only ruling ctmf can issue is one in agreement with my claims.
* Conversely, backseatpilot can assert his Judgitude and rule against me, though I would strongly contend that such a ruling would be completely illegal under these very straightforward circumstances, given that someone must be moving and that it plainly not ctmf, nor apparently flatluigi.
* In the interests of avoiding either paradox or communal ill-will, it seems most prudent to accept a ruling from ctmf in favor of my claim and allow voting on 322 to begin.
320-291 * (6/9) = 19 (rounded)
jay, ssg, and AAA all get 10 points too.
Hooray!
ctmf, I was waiting to see how things shook out before I voted. It'll pass if no one does anything crazy. Which clearly means *I* should be your stand-in voter.